Or is that not possible for Mat Lab. I tried it and it worked! For example the conditions are if h is greater than 25000 than T will be a separate value, if h is between 11000 and 25000 then T will be a different value and so on. You have misspelled the name of one of your output arguments inside your function, or you have forgotten to assign a value to one of the output arguments of your function. Can it be set so that if I enter V as different values then I can get different T values? That kind of situation is typically better handled by using error. Are you sure you have 102 outputs in your m-file calling sequence? If the assumption is that none of the above should ever happen then the first thing your code should do is check that the input conforms to these assumptions and error otherwise. Any help would be greatly appreciated You're using the function properly in the command window.
I removed the -1 and it was able to work but I then run into the next issue. That assignment to gesture is deep inside an if inside a for loop inside another if. In that specific case find the statement you would expect it to fall into and see why it is not doing. A branch is only ever going to be run once on each invocation of your function. The variable disappear at the end of the function and is going to be equal to 1 the next time the function is called. When the function completes, it attempts to return the value of whatever variable you have listed after function, but if that variable is not present you get an error. .
The code will then replace them as necessary. But assuming this is not an issue, do you really have 102 statements creating outpus from plhs 1 all the way through plhs 102? If the arguments do not exist, examine the function to determine where you intended the arguments to be declared. Given that your function body is entirely one massive if-elseif statement with no else at the end this would seem to imply that the union of all your logical cases in your statement does not cover every possibility so it fails every test and just drops through to the end of the function without setting y to anything. I don't know why the code not working. Alternatively, the function was originally written with one or more output arguments, but the section of the function that computed the output argument was removed or modified in such a way that the output argument is now extraneous.
The easiest way to avoid that error is to assign all the outputs as NaN initially. Therefore, what is the point in increasing o or m or n , for that matter why do the variable names change depending on the branch at the end of the branch. For example if you only pass in 1 column of train data then size train, 2 would be 1 and you subtract 1 from that to get the upper bound on the for loop, which would give you for from 1:0 which would not execute any iterations. It also works and plays well with vectors, and avoids the complexity of if blocks. It is not uncommon to encounter this kind of problem in situations in which you are checking the input arguments and if you find a problem then you return an error status in one of the arguments and then return, not having assigned to the other output arguments. Thank you I actually don't understand what you're trying to do in each branch. I hope you can help me.
If it does not, the NaN outputs will help you locate your problem. So how can I set it so that it works for several values of V? I have a function that Finds the Critical Points of a function. Verify that those lines of code are being executed and have no typographical errors. Either add an else to the bottom of the if-else statement with some default value or initialise it before the if statement or check through every single if-else condition and work out what is falling through the gaps. I hope you can help me. There may be a similar limit for the plhs array. That being said, I am not sure what the internal limit is for this.
This assumes that they would not otherwise be assigned NaN values as the result of calculations in your function. If either if is never true or if for some reason the loop never executes then gesture won't exist. I don'y know what I'm missing. I have updated my code to do the following:. I am trying to do a 1 nearest neighbor logic with a feature search function.
The problem is in the function CritPt itself: You need to assign a value to the variable cr. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . .
. . . . . . .